So Who Would Win?

The AL and NL both have a good group of rookies this season, but who would win if they were matched up in a game, or a series?

Offense

The American League probably has more major league ready hitting, with Garko, Pedroia and Gordon, but the National Leaguers have some high ceiling guys such as Stephen Drew and Chris Young. I probably didn't do an excellent job of selecting my AL outfield, especially with Travis Buck but I couldn't think of anyone else better. In the end however I just think Alex Gordon outweighs anything the NL has to offer in the middle of their lineup to give the American League the slight advantage here.

Pitching

This one is obviously no contest. The AL has some nice pitchers: Matt Garza pitched well last year, albeit struggled in the Majors, and Phil Hughes had a shot at a no no in just his second major league start. Obviously Matsuzaka would help them here. The NL though just has too much firepower. Lincecum and Bailey would be one of the better top twos in the major leagues, so having them on this team is huge. Plus Gallardo isn't exactly a stick in the mud in the 3 spot. Big big advantage to the National League.

So I suppose when you break it all down, even though I'm an AL fan, the winners have to be the National League. Lincecum and Bailey could both shut down the AL all-stars better than the AL starters could limit the NL bats. Even if there was a DH, the AL is giving away a free out with Jeff Mathis at catcher. Although the American League is better overall, the rookie battle certainly goes to the NL